Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Jamie Dimon says we've split the US economy, leaving the poor behind

J.P. Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said that the U.S. economy has essentially been split into those benefiting from thriving corporations and those who are left behind.

"I don't want to be a tone deaf CEO; while the company is doing fine, it is absolutely obvious that a big chunk of [people] have been left behind," Dimon said. "Forty percent of Americans make less than $15 an hour. Forty percent of Americans can't afford a $400 bill, whether it's medical or fixing their car. Fifteen percent of Americans make minimum wages, 70,000 die from opioids" annually.

"If you travel around to most neighborhoods where companies live, they're doing fine," Dimon said. "So we've kind of bifurcated the economy."

Dimon was speaking at an event at the bank's New York headquarters to unveil a new $350 million program to boost job prospects for people in under-served communities. The J.P. Morgan chairman and CEO has frequently voiced concern about the declining labor force participation rate and the shortfalls of the educational system in preparing people for emerging roles.

Making progress against these issues involves companies working with local organizations to provide skills outside of the university context, he said.

Dimon called the education system "broken" and said his bank stopped giving philanthropic dollars to colleges years ago.

"Harvard and Princeton are not a philanthropy," Dimon said. "Helping these kids is."

Sunday, March 17, 2019

Western Gas Partners (WES) Debt Trading 1% Lower

An issue of Western Gas Partners, LP (NYSE:WES) debt fell 1% as a percentage of its face value during trading on Friday. The high-yield debt issue has a 5.3% coupon and is set to mature on March 1, 2048. The debt is now trading at $91.39 and was trading at $91.52 one week ago. Price moves in a company’s debt in credit markets sometimes anticipate parallel moves in its stock price.

WES has been the subject of a number of recent research reports. ValuEngine raised Western Gas Partners from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research note on Tuesday, February 19th. Zacks Investment Research raised Western Gas Partners from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $56.00 target price for the company in a research note on Wednesday, February 20th. Stifel Nicolaus lowered Western Gas Partners from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating and lowered their target price for the company from $56.00 to $45.00 in a research note on Friday, December 21st. Wells Fargo & Co reissued a “hold” rating on shares of Western Gas Partners in a research note on Tuesday, February 19th. Finally, M Partners boosted their target price on Western Gas Partners from $42.00 to $55.00 and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a research note on Friday, February 15th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have assigned a hold rating and three have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. The company has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $50.09.

Get Western Gas Partners alerts:

NYSE:WES traded down $0.40 during mid-day trading on Friday, reaching $31.73. 3,387,700 shares of the company’s stock traded hands, compared to its average volume of 794,565. Western Gas Partners, LP has a 12-month low of $25.89 and a 12-month high of $38.62. The company has a market cap of $7.05 billion, a PE ratio of 12.64 and a beta of 1.55. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.37, a current ratio of 0.63 and a quick ratio of 0.63.

Western Gas Partners (NYSE:WES) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Thursday, February 14th. The pipeline company reported $0.10 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.75 by ($0.65). Western Gas Partners had a net margin of 19.06% and a return on equity of 11.72%. The business had revenue of $557.79 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $521.78 million. During the same quarter in the prior year, the firm earned $0.39 EPS. The firm’s revenue for the quarter was down 11.7% on a year-over-year basis. Analysts expect that Western Gas Partners, LP will post 2.29 EPS for the current fiscal year.

The firm also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Wednesday, February 13th. Investors of record on Friday, February 1st were issued a dividend of $0.98 per share. This represents a $3.92 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 12.35%. The ex-dividend date was Thursday, January 31st. This is an increase from Western Gas Partners’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.97. Western Gas Partners’s payout ratio is currently 96.02%.

A number of large investors have recently made changes to their positions in the stock. Tortoise Capital Advisors L.L.C. grew its holdings in shares of Western Gas Partners by 8.9% during the 3rd quarter. Tortoise Capital Advisors L.L.C. now owns 16,295,738 shares of the pipeline company’s stock worth $711,798,000 after acquiring an additional 1,333,515 shares during the period. Alps Advisors Inc. grew its stake in shares of Western Gas Partners by 12.6% in the 4th quarter. Alps Advisors Inc. now owns 9,954,452 shares of the pipeline company’s stock worth $420,377,000 after buying an additional 1,115,194 shares during the last quarter. OppenheimerFunds Inc. grew its stake in shares of Western Gas Partners by 53.2% in the 3rd quarter. OppenheimerFunds Inc. now owns 5,599,235 shares of the pipeline company’s stock worth $244,575,000 after buying an additional 1,944,940 shares during the last quarter. JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew its stake in shares of Western Gas Partners by 40.8% in the 3rd quarter. JPMorgan Chase & Co. now owns 3,509,650 shares of the pipeline company’s stock worth $153,302,000 after buying an additional 1,017,349 shares during the last quarter. Finally, RR Advisors LLC grew its stake in shares of Western Gas Partners by 73.8% in the 3rd quarter. RR Advisors LLC now owns 2,018,000 shares of the pipeline company’s stock worth $88,230,000 after buying an additional 857,000 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors own 61.18% of the company’s stock.

ILLEGAL ACTIVITY NOTICE: This article was first published by Ticker Report and is the sole property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this article on another domain, it was illegally stolen and reposted in violation of international copyright laws. The original version of this article can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4224522/western-gas-partners-wes-debt-trading-1-lower.html.

About Western Gas Partners (NYSE:WES)

Western Gas Partners, LP acquires, develops, owns, and operates midstream energy assets in the Rocky Mountains, North-central Pennsylvania, and Texas. It is involved in gathering, processing, compressing, treating, and transporting natural gas, condensate, natural gas liquids, and crude oil. Western Gas Holdings, LLC serves as the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP.

Featured Story: Options Trading

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Cramer Remix: I need to see better earnings before recommending this stock

CNBC's Jim Cramer took a call from a viewer about the stock of Ford, one of the iconic Big Three automotive companies that calls metro Detroit home.

The "Mad Money" host said he's not buying it.

"I'm not gonna recommend Ford. They are such a show me situation," he said. "They absolutely, absolutely, absolutely have to put up to get not one but two good quarters before I'll even think about recommending it to my viewers."

Perils of the market Pedestrians walk on Wall Street near the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York. Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images Pedestrians walk on Wall Street near the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York.

Investors must be aware of potential rewards and beware the potential risks when buying a stock because anything can happen on the stock market, Cramer said.

There are five current events that illustrate the "perils" of individual stock picking and why shareholders must have a strong stomach, he said. From the top plane manufacturer to the top social media platform to the divided politics across the pond, negative news can change the direction of an equity in a matter of seconds.

"I'm going to give you five reasons why it's so hard to make money in the stock market ... [preparing] you for the inevitable pain that comes with owning individual stocks," the host said. "These have all snuck up on people, making them queasy. If the thought of them scares you, then you might want to rethink how you invest your money."

There are many advantages in owning stocks, but index funds provide the best market exposure, he said.

Read more here

Pump the brakes Source: NYSE

Carvana has been on a hot streak. The stock is up about 7 percent this week, 70 percent in 2019 and 160 percent year-over-year.

Still, the online used-car platform is roughly $17 off of its all-time high in September after slipping with the rest of the market in the fourth quarter. Cramer said it was crushed without a specific reason.

The host acknowledged that he mistakenly recommended buying Carvana's weakness in October—the stock eventually touched $28 prior to Christmas. Carvana has since recovered, without big news, much of those losses and caught a spark despite disappointing quarter results two weeks ago to close shy of $56 Thursday, he said.

"When Carvana was reporting great numbers in the fourth quarter and its stock was going down, it was a fabulous buying opportunity," Cramer said. "Now, though, we keep getting what I'd consider to be bad news ... [in a] scathing research report, a disappointing quarter, [but] the stock keeps going higher. At these levels, you know what I say [sell].

Get Cramer's full insight here

A transparent turnaround Larry Culp, CEO, General Electric Scott Mlyn | CNBC Larry Culp, CEO, General Electric

General Electric will be open about its struggles and the goals it expects to achieve in the company's turnaround plan, CEO Larry Culp told CNBC.

"I think what we're gonna try to do, frankly, is to share with people in as transparent a way as we possibly can, what those issues are ... and the plan that we have," he said in a sit-down interview with Cramer. "But it will take-- time. And we don't wanna sugarcoat this."

Read more and catch the interview here

Improving the trucking lifestyle Drew McElroy, CEO, left, and Jonathan Salama, CTO, Transfix Scott Mlyn | CNBC Drew McElroy, CEO, left, and Jonathan Salama, CTO, Transfix

With online shopping growing and new safety regulations in place, the shipping industry is short on truck drivers, Cramer said. He talked with the co-founders of Transfix to learn how the private company is addressing the supply chain of freight shipping.

"Ultimately, we want to empower whomever wants to be a truck driver and historically truck driving can be a fantastic profession," Transfix co-founder and CEO Drew McElroy said. "In the last 20 years, it has been a very difficult lifestyle. The ability to both drive quantitative [return on investment] as well as qualitative life improvements, we think makes the profession much more attractive."

See the full interview here

A tale of two stocks Michael Dell, founder and chief executive officer of Dell Inc. Matthew Busch | Bloomberg | Getty Images Michael Dell, founder and chief executive officer of Dell Inc.

"Boeing is a question mark," Cramer said.

He called it a "battleground" stock in the wake of two 737 Max jet tragedies in recent months. The bulls and bears are divided on the stock's performance, and the analysts have differing projections on how long the software fix for the top-selling airplanes will take, he said.

On the other hand, Cramer thinks Dell Technologies is in an interesting position. He noted the computer maker is carrying more than $50 billion in debt on $10 billion cash flow.

"Dell has no real bear case aside from the balance sheet and I think that's overblown," Cramer said. "Boeing has potentially a huge amount of risk."

Click here to hear Cramer's recommendations

Cramer's lightning round: This bank is too good to sell at this price

In Cramer's lightning round, the "Mad Money" host gave callers his thoughts on their stock picks.

Bank of America Corp.: "No, it's too inexpensive [to sell]. ... I don't want you to sell it and if it comes down, maybe you buy some more. I just think it's too good a company to let loose at these prices."

YY Inc.: "YY, no. ... I don't like the stock YY, though. Why? Because it's a Chinese company of let's say of indeterminate earnings. So let's take a pass."

Okta Inc.: "I think they're a great company. I mean if you're up really big, obviously no one ever got hurt taking a little profit. But Okta is a great company and good for the long term."

Questions for Cramer?
Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC

Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? Hit him up!
Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram

Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? madcap@cnbc.com

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Bridge Bancorp Inc (BDGE) Files 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended on December 31, 2018

Bridge Bancorp Inc (NASDAQ:BDGE) files its latest 10-K with SEC for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2018. Bridge Bancorp Inc is a bank holding company for The Bridgehampton National Bank. It provides commercial and consumer banking business, including saving and deposits from the consumers, commercial and real estate loans and home equity loans. Bridge Bancorp Inc has a market cap of $636.310 million; its shares were traded at around $32.15 with a P/E ratio of 16.24 and P/S ratio of 4.23. The dividend yield of Bridge Bancorp Inc stocks is 2.86%.

For the last quarter Bridge Bancorp Inc reported a revenue of $39.4 million, compared with the revenue of $38.06 million during the same period a year ago. For the latest fiscal year the company reported a revenue of $148.9 million, an increase of 2.5% from last year. For the last five years Bridge Bancorp Inc had an average revenue growth rate of 21.2% a year.

The reported diluted earnings per share was $1.97 for the year, an increase of 89.4% from previous year. Over the last five years Bridge Bancorp Inc had an EPS growth rate of 5.3% a year. The profitability rank of the company is 3 (out of 10).

At the end of the fiscal year, Bridge Bancorp Inc has the cash and cash equivalents of $295.4 million, compared with $94.7 million in the previous year. The long term debt was $319.2 million, compared with $580.0 million in the previous year. Bridge Bancorp Inc has a financial strength rank of 3 (out of 10).

At the current stock price of $32.15, Bridge Bancorp Inc is traded at 15.4% premium to its historical median P/S valuation band of $27.85. The P/S ratio of the stock is 4.23, while the historical median P/S ratio is 3.68. The stock lost 5.57% during the past 12 months.

For the complete 20-year historical financial data of BDGE, click here.

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Barnes & Noble (Finally) Puts a Decent Quarter in the Books

Barnes & Noble (NYSE:BKS) has seen its revenue steadily decline for about five years. That makes sense, since the company had no real digital strategy and Amazon more or less froze it out of that part of the market.

That left the brick-and-mortar chain as merely a way for customers to browse books before buying them on Amazon. Sure, the in-store visitor might buy a closeout item or something in the cafe, but the biggest piece of the sale -- the new book purchase -- too often went to Barnes & Noble's digital rival.

BKS Revenue (Annual) Chart

Image source: YCharts.

The physical retailer, however, does have its fans, and Barnes & Noble has focused on serving educators, book lovers, and collectors. Those customers never abandoned the chain, and while the mass audience may never come back, the company's latest quarterly earnings report shows that it might be able to survive -- and maybe even thrive.

How did Barnes & Noble do?

The bookselling chain (which also offers toys, collectibles, and some gift items) generated $1.2 billion of revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2019: flat compared to the prior year. Same-store sales, however, rose by 1.1%. The company noted in the earnings release that this reflected its "best quarterly performance in several years."

But while the same-store increase is encouraging, it's not the chain's biggest achievement. That would be its $79.2 million operating profit, compared to an operating loss of $34.9 million last year. Net income came in at $66.9 million, or $0.91 per share, compared to a loss of $63.5 million, or $0.87 per share, in the prior-year period.

Those numbers, however, are somewhat deceiving, since last year's loss was driven by a one-time non-cash charge of $135.4 million. So, while profitability has technically improved, adjusted EBITDA actually decreased by $6.5 million last quarter. Management attributed the decline to increased marketing and promotional costs.

A customer browses in a bookstore.

Barnes & Noble remains primarily a bookseller. Image source: Getty Images.

"In fiscal 2019, we have been focused on growing the top line, which contributed to our best holiday in years," Barnes & Noble Chairman Len Riggio said in the Q3 earnings release. "Sales benefited from our new ad campaign, increased marketing and promotions, and an improved omni-channel experience for our customers. We believe these efforts are laying the foundation for sustained growth."

The chain forecasts that full-year EBITDA will come in between $140 million and $155 million, excluding unusual or non-recurring items. That would be roughly in line with last year's adjusted EBITDA of $145.4 million, but well below the $175 million to $200 million that management expected as recently as November. The revised guidance reflects the "impact of incremental investments the company is making in its business, as well as lower than expected post-holiday sales," according to the press release.

A new chapter

Barnes & Noble's earnings report was a mixed bag, but let's call it a modest victory for the bookseller. It shows that by carefully controlling costs and serving its core customer well, a future may yet exist for Barnes & Noble.

These numbers, however, do not show a path toward significant growth. The release also fails to mention any of the revenue-driving experiments the company has conducted, including adding alcohol and expanded restaurants to some of its locations. Realistically, those types of changes were moves of desperation. Tweaking the cafe menu or adding wine and beer may add some incremental sales, but nobody goes to a bookstore because it sells alcohol.

The smart play for Barnes & Noble is to double down on what works. There's very little left to cut when it comes to operational expenses, although the chain may have some leverage to negotiate lower rents as leases come up, due to the current retail climate. It also has more space than it needs in many locations, as CDs and DVDs are no longer a viable market.

This earnings report shows that a smaller, leaner, well-run Barnes & Noble can survive. That's not exactly a comeback, but it's better than the trajectory the company was on before.

 

Monday, March 11, 2019

Zacks: Analysts Anticipate Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) Will Post Quarterly Sales of $6

Wall Street analysts expect Enterprise Financial Services Corp (NASDAQ:EFSC) to post sales of $62.38 million for the current fiscal quarter, according to Zacks Investment Research. Three analysts have provided estimates for Enterprise Financial Services’ earnings, with estimates ranging from $57.00 million to $66.03 million. Enterprise Financial Services reported sales of $55.71 million in the same quarter last year, which would suggest a positive year over year growth rate of 12%. The business is scheduled to issue its next earnings results on Monday, April 22nd.

According to Zacks, analysts expect that Enterprise Financial Services will report full year sales of $288.17 million for the current financial year, with estimates ranging from $282.40 million to $296.62 million. For the next fiscal year, analysts expect that the business will post sales of $310.34 million, with estimates ranging from $303.10 million to $318.13 million. Zacks’ sales calculations are a mean average based on a survey of sell-side research analysts that that provide coverage for Enterprise Financial Services.

Get Enterprise Financial Services alerts:

Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) last posted its earnings results on Monday, January 21st. The bank reported $1.06 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of $0.95 by $0.11. Enterprise Financial Services had a return on equity of 14.71% and a net margin of 32.31%. The firm had revenue of $61.30 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $59.43 million.

Several equities analysts recently issued reports on EFSC shares. Zacks Investment Research raised Enterprise Financial Services from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $49.00 target price on the stock in a research note on Wednesday, January 23rd. ValuEngine upgraded Enterprise Financial Services from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 13th. Finally, BidaskClub upgraded Enterprise Financial Services from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 13th. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, one has assigned a hold rating and four have issued a buy rating to the stock. The company presently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $55.25.

In other Enterprise Financial Services news, President Scott Richard Goodman sold 1,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, February 21st. The stock was sold at an average price of $46.49, for a total transaction of $46,490.00. Following the sale, the president now owns 47,872 shares in the company, valued at approximately $2,225,569.28. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available through the SEC website. 2.60% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.

A number of hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently modified their holdings of EFSC. American Century Companies Inc. increased its holdings in shares of Enterprise Financial Services by 14.9% in the 4th quarter. American Century Companies Inc. now owns 115,431 shares of the bank’s stock valued at $4,344,000 after acquiring an additional 14,961 shares during the last quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC increased its holdings in shares of Enterprise Financial Services by 9.6% in the 4th quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 264,480 shares of the bank’s stock valued at $9,952,000 after acquiring an additional 23,120 shares during the last quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP increased its holdings in shares of Enterprise Financial Services by 1.9% in the 4th quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 1,047,191 shares of the bank’s stock valued at $39,406,000 after acquiring an additional 19,498 shares during the last quarter. Deprince Race & Zollo Inc. increased its holdings in shares of Enterprise Financial Services by 250.2% in the 4th quarter. Deprince Race & Zollo Inc. now owns 209,375 shares of the bank’s stock valued at $7,879,000 after acquiring an additional 149,586 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Nordea Investment Management AB increased its holdings in shares of Enterprise Financial Services by 0.8% in the 4th quarter. Nordea Investment Management AB now owns 109,200 shares of the bank’s stock valued at $4,109,000 after acquiring an additional 900 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors own 77.41% of the company’s stock.

EFSC traded up $0.12 during mid-day trading on Friday, hitting $43.19. 58,959 shares of the stock were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 96,493. Enterprise Financial Services has a 1-year low of $36.09 and a 1-year high of $58.15. The company has a current ratio of 1.05, a quick ratio of 1.05 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.16. The firm has a market cap of $1.07 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 11.96, a PEG ratio of 1.30 and a beta of 1.14.

The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, March 29th. Shareholders of record on Friday, March 15th will be issued a dividend of $0.14 per share. This is an increase from Enterprise Financial Services’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.13. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Thursday, March 14th. This represents a $0.56 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.30%. Enterprise Financial Services’s dividend payout ratio is 14.40%.

Enterprise Financial Services Company Profile

Enterprise Financial Services Corp operates as the financial holding company for Enterprise Bank & Trust that offers banking and wealth management services to individuals and corporate customers. The company offers demand deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts, money market accounts, and savings deposits, as well as certificates of deposit.

Featured Article: How to execute a trade ex-dividend strategy?

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Enterprise Financial Services (EFSC)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Earnings History and Estimates for Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC)

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Equities Analysts Issue Forecasts for Adamas Pharmaceuticals Inc’s Q1 2019 Earnings (ADMS)

Adamas Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:ADMS) – Stock analysts at Svb Leerink issued their Q1 2019 EPS estimates for shares of Adamas Pharmaceuticals in a research note issued to investors on Monday, March 4th. Svb Leerink analyst M. Goodman anticipates that the specialty pharmaceutical company will earn ($1.31) per share for the quarter. Svb Leerink also issued estimates for Adamas Pharmaceuticals’ Q2 2019 earnings at ($0.85) EPS, Q3 2019 earnings at ($0.78) EPS, Q4 2019 earnings at ($0.81) EPS, FY2019 earnings at ($3.65) EPS, FY2020 earnings at ($2.10) EPS, FY2021 earnings at ($1.20) EPS, FY2022 earnings at $0.30 EPS and FY2023 earnings at $2.40 EPS.

Get Adamas Pharmaceuticals alerts:

ADMS has been the topic of several other reports. Zacks Investment Research lowered Adamas Pharmaceuticals from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a report on Wednesday, February 27th. HC Wainwright set a $40.00 price objective on Adamas Pharmaceuticals and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Monday, January 14th. BidaskClub raised Adamas Pharmaceuticals from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Monday, February 25th. Cowen lowered Adamas Pharmaceuticals from an “outperform” rating to a “market perform” rating and dropped their price objective for the company from $30.00 to $15.00 in a report on Tuesday. Finally, Leerink Swann assumed coverage on Adamas Pharmaceuticals in a report on Monday, November 12th. They issued an “outperform” rating and a $20.00 price objective on the stock. Two analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, five have assigned a hold rating and four have issued a buy rating to the stock. Adamas Pharmaceuticals presently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $23.88.

Shares of ADMS opened at $7.87 on Thursday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.01, a quick ratio of 8.74 and a current ratio of 8.95. Adamas Pharmaceuticals has a 12 month low of $7.42 and a 12 month high of $32.90.

Adamas Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ADMS) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Monday, March 4th. The specialty pharmaceutical company reported ($1.06) EPS for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of ($1.36) by $0.30. Adamas Pharmaceuticals had a negative return on equity of 106.74% and a negative net margin of 617.27%. The company had revenue of $13.32 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $13.30 million.

Several large investors have recently modified their holdings of ADMS. First Mercantile Trust Co. boosted its stake in shares of Adamas Pharmaceuticals by 43.2% in the fourth quarter. First Mercantile Trust Co. now owns 5,765 shares of the specialty pharmaceutical company’s stock worth $49,000 after acquiring an additional 1,740 shares during the last quarter. Advisor Group Inc. boosted its stake in shares of Adamas Pharmaceuticals by 252.0% in the fourth quarter. Advisor Group Inc. now owns 6,300 shares of the specialty pharmaceutical company’s stock worth $54,000 after acquiring an additional 4,510 shares during the last quarter. Pacer Advisors Inc. acquired a new stake in shares of Adamas Pharmaceuticals in the third quarter worth approximately $104,000. Barclays PLC boosted its stake in shares of Adamas Pharmaceuticals by 87.6% in the fourth quarter. Barclays PLC now owns 17,387 shares of the specialty pharmaceutical company’s stock worth $148,000 after acquiring an additional 8,118 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Assenagon Asset Management S.A. acquired a new stake in shares of Adamas Pharmaceuticals in the fourth quarter worth approximately $161,000. 79.76% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

About Adamas Pharmaceuticals

Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc discovers, develops, and sells therapies for chronic neurologic disorders. The company's approved/commercial product is GOCOVRI, an amantadine therapy for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease. Its partnered approved/commercial products include Namzaric (memantine hydrochloride extended-release and donepezil hydrochloride) capsules; and Namenda XR (memantine hydrochloride) extended release capsules for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

Further Reading: The mechanics of the bid-ask spread in trading

Earnings History and Estimates for Adamas Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ADMS)

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Energy Recovery Inc (ERII) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Energy Recovery Inc  (NASDAQ:ERII)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallMarch 07, 2019, 5:00 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, greetings and welcome to the Energy Recovery Fourth Quarter Full Year Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this program is being recorded.

It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Jim Siccardi, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, you may begin.

James Siccardi -- Vice President of Investor Relations

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to Energy Recovery's full year 2018 earnings conference call. My name is Jim Siccardi, Vice President of Investor Relations with Energy Recovery. And I am here today with our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Chris Gannon, and our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Joshua Ballard.

During today's call, we may make projections and other forward-looking statements under the safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company. These statements may discuss our business, economic and market outlook, the Company's ability to achieve the milestones, and commercialization under the VorTeq licensing agreement, growth expectations, new products and their performance, cost structure and business strategy. Forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and on management's beliefs, assumptions, estimates or projections. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors.

We refer you to documents that Company files from time to time with the SEC, specifically the Company's Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. These documents identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements. All statements made during this call are made only as of today, March 7, 2019, and the Company expressly disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during this call to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, unless otherwise required by law.

In addition, we may make some references to non-GAAP financial measures during this call. You will find supplemental data in the Company's earnings press release, which was released to newswires and furnished to the SEC earlier today. The press release includes reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP results.

At this point, I'd like to turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Joshua Ballard. Josh, the floor is yours.

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. When I joined Energy Recovery last August, I was excited by the opportunity that the Company presented. First, it's strong global Water business offering multiple, sustainable growth paths, and second, the potential of its Pressure Exchanger technology in Oil & Gas, as well as other industries. My excitement has only grown as I've gotten to know the strength of our team and core technologies. I believe 2019 will be an exciting transformational year for Energy Recovery.

Turing to our 2018 financial performance. We have closed record year at Energy Recovery. For fiscal year 2018, we generated $74.5 million in total revenue, an 8% increase over 2017, our previous performance high watermark. Our Water business achieved $60.5 million in revenue, an increase of 11% over 2017. This strong growth has been driven largely by mega projects, those generating over 50,000 cubic meters of water or more per day. We are very pleased with the upward trend in our core water business and expect additional strong growth in 2019 and 2020. The overall seawater reverse osmosis desalination industry remains robust throughout the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

Our Oil & Gas business generated total revenue of $14 million for fiscal year 2018. Of the total Oil & Gas revenue, $13.5 million was related to ASC 606 recognition of VorTeq license revenue. The remaining revenue was associated with cost to total cost revenue recognition related to the sale of multiple IsoBoost systems.

Product gross margin remained strong, ending the year at 71%. This is the highest product gross margin in the Company's history, driven by the shipment of a record number of PX Pressure Exchangers in 2018. Overall, operating expenditures grew from $40.8 million in 2017 to $46.7 million in 2018, a 14% increase. Over 60% of this increase spend was focused on expanding our research and development activities as we invested in our Oil & Gas field operations group, and an additional testing of our VorTeq system. Research and development spend has grown an average of 30% over the past three years, reflecting the nature of our engineering technology-driven business. We expect similar increases in operating spend in 2019. More than two-thirds of our OpEx growth this year is focused on research and development for both Water, and Oil & Gas initiatives. The remaining spend will be on the people, systems and infrastructure to support expected growth in our Water and Oil & Gas divisions.

We generated operating income of $10 million for 2018, an 8% increase over 2017, and net income of $22.1 million or $0.40 per diluted share, $0.20 when adjusted for a one-time tax benefit related to the simplification of our international tax structure early in 2018. Our capital expenditures were $5.2 million in 2018. The majority of this spend was related to the purchase of high-pressure hydraulic fracturing equipment to advance the testing of our Oil & Gas solutions. We expect our capital expenditures to increase considerably in 2019 as we build our Texas-based Commercial Development Center, and as we expand our water manufacturing operations to meet anticipated demand.

In addition, we intend to put in place new systems and capabilities to strengthen the foundations of our business in preparation for Water division growth and the commercialization of our VorTeq system. Despite these infrastructure investments, our cash flow and balance sheet remained strong. Operating cash flow for fiscal year 2018 was $7.6 million, 160% higher than in 2017, and we ended the year with $96.7 million in cash and securities with no debt. Overall for the year, we experienced a net reduction in cash and securities of $3.9 million, a result of the $10 million share repurchase program that occurred in the first half of 2018. I am pleased that we have maintained a balance sheet that gives us full flexibility to invest in growing our business.

And with that, I will hand it over to our President and CEO, Chris Gannon.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Josh, and thank you everyone for joining us today. Let me first begin by reiterating a couple of our key near-term strategic objectives. First, we are focused on growth and reinvestment in our core Water business. Second, we are concentrating the efforts of our Oil & Gas business on commercializing the VorTeq systems. Throughout this call, I will provide updates on our progress around these two objectives.

A year ago I pledged to our shareholders a tireless work ethic, full transparency, and a single-minded dedication to the success of Energy Recovery. At that time, I had just taken over as CEO, and my assessment then that it was an exciting time for Energy Recovery is even more true today. I see a leveled momentum within our Water, and Oil & Gas businesses that is unprecedented. Over the past year, I have spoken often of our need to invest in infrastructure to enhance our near-term execution, as well as support rapid, sustainable and transformational growth. While the Company may have had solid business fundamentals at the beginning of 2018, it was clear to me that a stronger foundation for near- and long-term success needed to be built. As such, over the past year we have made substantial progress in this regard across all areas of Energy Recovery. For instance, we separated the Company into two business units to ensure appropriate focus and resource allocation. In Water, we began investing in the improvement of our existing product lines, the expansion of our water product and solution offerings, the increase of our manufacturing capacity and the improvement of processes throughout our operations. These investments should support our efforts to maintain our commanding market share in seawater reverse osmosis desalination, and grow our presence within the broader desalination market.

On the Oil & Gas side, we made substantial progress in advancing the system level of enhancements of our VorTeq technology. In addition, we made significant infrastructure investments to formalize our Oil & Gas business, including dramatically increasing our full scale field testing capabilities and growing our in-house yield operations' expertise. In addition, we continue to build our research and development organization. These investments should place us in the best path position to further accelerate and ultimately commercialize the VorTeq.

Now turning to a more detailed discussion of our core Water business, which remains the lifeblood of Energy Recovery. In 2018, we achieved our fourth consecutive year of top line revenue growth with $60.5 million in revenue, more than 11% increase over 2017. In addition, we achieved a record 71% gross margin for the year, which continues to underscore the value proposition of our leading PX Pressure Exchanger and other desalination technologies. Further, we successfully won every major mega project on which we bet. We have often referred to the cyclical nature of the desalination industry with it being on a four- to six-year cycle. However, we are in the fifth consecutive year of an upcycle, and project activity continues to expand with little signs of slowing. In fact, today we have the most significant backlog and the most robust pipeline in the Company's history with activity and awards spanning 2019 and 2020.

Importantly, the global need for palpable water isn't undeniable. The effects of climate change, population growth, and the rise of industrialization have played a major role in driving water scarcity, and it'd have had a substantial impact on water demand. Today, desalination is the most effective man-made solution to produce large quantities of palpable water and much of that water is being produced by a seawater reverse osmosis desalination or SWRO. In fact, today, water produced by SWRO costs significantly less than it did in the 1990s when the industry was relying on other non now-outdated technologies such as thermal desalination. This decrease in costs has been one of the primary factors for the acceptance, growth and success of desalination as a cost effective solution for the world's water needs. We are proud of the role, our PX Pressure Exchanger technology has played in this global transformation.

Desalination provides approximately 1% of palpable part needs globally. Let me repeat, approximately 1%. However, if you look at countries like Israel and Saudi Arabia, which have been at the forefront of desalination revolution, this number is significantly higher. According to The Times of Israel, 55% of the country's water needs and 70% of its drinking water commence from desalination. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Affairs magazine reported that desalination currently supplies 70% of the country's urban water supplies. I believe, we will continue to see growth in SWRO as more of the world follow the lead set by countries like Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Positive industry trends, our growing backlog and pipeline and still confidence in the strength of our Water business unit, and our belief that the Company's revenues will grow between 5% and 8% in 2019 and 2020 with our existing product offering. As such, we are proactively investing in our Water operations to materially increase manufacturing capacity in 2019, all in order to support the increasing level of activity we see this year and beyond. This includes purchasing new machinery and technologies for manufacturing, as well as increasing headcount, so we can sustain top line growth.

As I have mentioned in the past, the Water business for us is about more than just simply maintaining the status quo. Our Water team is focusing on identifying new opportunities for growth and expansion, and we have made great progress on that front since our last earnings call. We are aggressively pursuing these opportunities through organic and inorganic means. As these initiatives continue to evolve, we will update you accordingly. While except for existing partnerships, we do not expect material new revenue from these endeavors in 2019. We do expect to set the stage for significant growth as we head into 2020 and beyond. The growth we anticipate in Water during 2019 and 2020 is not dependent upon any of the water growth initiatives that are currently being pursued. Our core Water business alone is exhibiting incredible strength, enabling us to view the next two years with great optimism. By executing on any of our water growth initiatives, our already robust outlook could prove even brighter. In short, I'm thrilled with the performance and outlook of our Water business and anticipate our investment will lay the foundation for even stronger future growth.

Now turning to Oil & Gas. 2018 was a tremendous year for this business. We made substantial progress, building the necessary infrastructure to advance our VorTeq technology in pursuit of the ultimate goal successful commercialization. We have taken firm control of our research and development process by acquiring the field resources, equipments and facilities we need to further advance and ultimately commercialize the VorTeq system. Furthermore, we have made tremendous progress on the system, specifically on the design enhancements agreed upon with our product licensee last summer.

It was apparent when I took over last year that we had a limited ability to test the VorTeq system at scale, which within conditions representative of a live well. We were overtly reliant on our product licensee and product partner for resources including frac, personnel and high-pressure equipment to conduct required tests. The status quo is not acceptable, and as such, we made a significant investment to acquire the in-house resources necessary. Today, we are no longer solely reliant on our product licensee or product partner to field test and advance the VorTeq system. These were large, but critical investments that should allow us to accelerate the pace of commercialization. We will continue to invest in our internal capabilities in 2019, adding new field personnel to maximize our ability to independently test at our new Commercial Development Center outside of Houston, Texas.

The personnel and expertise required will be critical to our success as we advance toward commercialization and beyond when we deploy our technology in a production environment. By taking ownership of the research and development process, we have already accelerated development of the system-level enhancements agreed upon with our product licensee, following the technical review in 2018. These design enhancements are specifically focused on system, durability and reliability. As a reminder, Energy Recovery in our product licensee agreed to develop and implement these system level enhancements ahead of Milestone 1 to shorten the overall path to commercialization.

It is important to remember that we are designing, manufacturing and deploying newly invented technologies. Following our purchase of high-pressure hydraulic fracturing equipment at the end of 2018, we moved into a new phase of regular field testing. We must be able to repeatedly test the system at scale to address technical and operational challenges, which is what we are doing now. This repeated testing is critical to deliver a resilient system that can ensure the harsh environment of hydraulic fracturing. In prior years, the issues we were dealing with were complex and related to the viability of the core VorTeq technology. Today, as we test more frequently in field conditions, the issues we are encountering are a less complex in nature, but still must be addressed prior to Milestone 1 in commercialization. We have made tremendous progress on VorTeq throughout 2018 and early 2019. I will share more about our progress during our first quarter release call in eight weeks. I want you to know that we have every intention of advancing the technology to attempt Milestone 1 in 2018 as we move toward commercialization.

I'm happy to report that construction is under way at the new Commercial Development Center. We began land stabilization work in January 2019, which is a prerequisite to using the yard for testing. I wanted to be clear as to why the center is crucial piece of our infrastructure. First, the Center provides a permanent home to test any of our Oil & Gas Pressure Exchanger applications. Technical and operational development will not end at the successful completion of a test or even when we successfully commercialize. As with any technology, we will continue to refine and optimize the VorTeq system post-commercialization.

Second, the Center has been designed to provide the support capabilities, capacity required as we ramp up in production environment. Specifically, we will have the ability to handle the final machining required in our proprietary high-precision tungsten carbide manufacturing process. We'll be able to fully control quality, as well as to maintain, repair and store Pressure Exchanger cartridges and equipment.

Third, the Center consolidates our Oil & Gas operations in Texas at the center of the US Oil & Gas industry. The proximity to Houston reduces travel costs and relieves stress in our field and engineering teams, thereby improving productivity. Furthermore, the proximity to our product licensee will allow us to collaborate more closely as we move into this next phase of product development and progress further toward commercialization. We view the investment in the Commercial Development Center as a critical step in the maturation of Energy Recovery's Oil & Gas business unit, and you should see this as a strong signal of our commitment to and belief in the VorTeq technology.

In closing, 2018 was a tremendous year for Energy Recovery. We experienced record top line revenue growth and profitability within our core Water business. Our strong existing backlog and pipeline, as well as positive market trends instill confidence, we will experience further growth in 2019 and 2020. We are also aggressively pursuing growth in new product and solution offerings, which could further drive Water business growth. Furthermore, we made great strides in advancing the VorTeq technology over the past year. We invested heavily in our own testing and field operations' infrastructure, and plan to continue our investment in infrastructure during 2019 as we move to the next phase of VorTeq development on the path to product commercialization.

As I said at the outset, I've never been more optimistic about the future of Energy Recovery. We've begun 2019, building on the tremendous momentum we experienced in 2018. We know there is much work left to do, and I firmly believe our business is in an excellent position to achieve success in 2019 and beyond.

With that, I will turn the call over for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now be conducting our Q&A session. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Tom Curran from FBR. You're now live.

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Good afternoon guys.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hey Tom, how you're doing?

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Good. So product revenue ended up coming in for 2018 about 20% higher than what you used to think of as around your cyclical ceiling. The product gross margin at 74.5% was simply astounding. Chris, Josh, as you guys look into 2019, questions on both the top line and profitability. First, given this ongoing surge we've seen in MPDs, just how much visibility and coverage do you have already for 2019 revenue? And then, what should we expect for the quarterly sequence from here for gross margin?

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

Hey Tom, this is Josh. So when we are looking forward in terms of our visibility, as you know, we see roughly 18 months out -- or we see 36 months out in terms of our mega projects. We start signing projects, they give us a good feeling for about 18 months out -- 12 months to 18 months out. So we've got a relatively good feel for mega projects this year. But OEM and our aftermarket have much shorter cycles, and so we see at OEM, maybe up to 12 months, and aftermarket just a few months. That's helpful.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

And in terms of our gross margin going forward, and we feel that the gross margin going into 2019 is going to be fairly similar to what you saw in 2018.

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

And would that include a similar quarterly sequential progression in addition to comparable average annual?

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

No. When we're looking at quarterly numbers, remember there's a lot of movement that occurs with our mega projects from quarter to quarter. So I don't think you should look for -- specifically quarter against quarter more at the overall year.

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Okay. And then Chris on VorTeq, just a few points of clarification, a three part, but simple question. So, one, could you just confirm that by saying in the press release that you're collaborating closely with your partners. By partners, you mean, both of the two licensees that have been involved contractually from the beginning, Schlumberger and Liberty? Two, when you referred to the next phase of commercialization, that the next phase does indeed include the successful completion of M1? And then, three, just what are the remaining conditions that must be met for the M1 test to be resumed?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So to your first question on who we're working with, we are back working with our product licensee, and our product partner very closely. So that was that one. In terms of the -- if I remember the word, the next phase of commercialization, what we're focusing on is field testing and regular field testing. So now that we have our own equipment, we are able to test at scale constantly. We now have the resources and the structure in place to independently advance the development of the VorTeq system. We didn't have that before. What was the third part?

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

And then, just what conditions would need to be met at this point via all of that field testing? What's going to determine when you're ready to resume M1?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So we're focusing on the reliability of the system. And so the timing along the path of R&D is never, never certain as you know. However, field of the requirements and activities successfully developed VorTeq are well within our graph at this point. So I'm not going to give you a specific timing, some of that's in our control, others it's not. But the challenges that we face continue to diminish complexity, again, as we continue to accumulate run time.

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Okay. I'll get back in the queue. Thanks for the answers.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, absolutely. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Joseph Osha from JMP Securities. You're now live.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Hello there.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Joe. Go blue.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Yes, indeed. So following up a little bit on on the questions that were just asked. The understanding that we can't get into too many details. Is it really down to in terms of what you're trying to understand with VorTeq at this point, just reliability and run time, or are there any other more fundamental issues around your vibration or the way the materials acting or is it just getting run time on the system at this point?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. I mean, it's really down to the reliability of the system in real-world conditions, and that's where we're focused. We're past the -- again, the fundamental viability of the core technology, that we know works.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay. And given how you kind of reposition this with your internal test capability, I mean, is it possible that you might go out and engage additional parties or you kind of happy working with the people that you have at this point?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. It's really not something we're evaluating at this time. I mean, we have the internal capability to test, and then of course, then we can test with both our licensed partner and our product partner. We've already begun to experience tangible benefits, given that we have our testing independence at this point, and it's really about accumulating run time.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

That makes sense. And we had spoken at one point about the idea of maybe all building another missile, so this one isn't getting just madly toward the hither and thither and yon. Is that still something that you're entertaining?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

At this point, we are focused on -- again the reliability of the system, and as we experienced changes we -- or things that we need to improve, we will continue to adjust the existing missile. At the right appropriate time, yes, we'll go and build another missile and hopefully many, many missiles, but right now I'm not evaluating spending more CapEx specifically on another missile.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay. And shifting gears to the Water business, obviously, there was the ducting announcement. And I'm wondering what if anything you might be contemplating in terms of additional additions to your skill set on that side?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Can you repeat that question?

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Just wondering, if you're looking at maybe doing anything else like ducting in terms of adding additional skill sets to your Water portfolio?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, absolutely. Okay, so I apologize for that. We're looking at expanding our product offering very considerably. And we're doing that for on an organic and the inorganic means. And so not only are we focusing on just products, we're also focusing on solution offerings. And so, that's where we're going, and so we're at the front end of that process. We spent a lot of time last year developing that strategy and now we're in the process of executing upon that.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

All right. So we could see additional M&A or additional activities in that space as you continue to move forward?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So we're not right now focusing on M&A, but more partnerships and getting to know potential partners like Duchting, for example. So as we expand our product portfolio, that's what we're going to do first.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay, great. And then last question for me. Just wondering if I can get a sense as to what the sort of operating cost run rate might look like in 2019. And I'm sorry if I missed that.

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

No problem, it's Josh. You can expect operating income to grow -- I'm sorry, operating expenditures to grow at a similar pace as they did in 2018. And that's going to, I would assume, just a -- we saw about $11.5 million to $12 million in quarterly spend last year. And I'd expect that here in the early part of the year and it will slowly ramp up through the year.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Yes, it will grow less rapidly than revenues, yes?

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

Well, it grew a little bit over -- about 14% last year. So it's going to grow at that same amount, give or take this year.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Urban from Seaport Global. You're now live.

Michael Urban -- Seaport Global Securities -- Analyst

Thanks. Good afternoon guys.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Mike.

Michael Urban -- Seaport Global Securities -- Analyst

So I wanted to follow-up on the one of the last questions about some of the growth efforts in your adjacent verticals there. So it doesn't tell you're expecting much in the way of revenue contribution this year, maybe more of a 2020 and beyond. But can you give a sense for when we could expect kind of commercialization of new products roll out or some of the first tangible signs of benefit from those efforts?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, I mean, where we see -- we currently have the relationship with Duchting, which has shown some early great signs later in the last part of 2018. We think that we'll continue to see growth with that partner as we enter 2019. In terms of our new products that will be out there, selling or bundling, if you will, it's really going to be in 2020, and I anticipate that.

Michael Urban -- Seaport Global Securities -- Analyst

Okay, got you. And apologize if I had missed this. I think you said CapEx would be up considerably in '19, but I missed the number. Do you have a kind of a dollar amount you're looking at for this year?

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. We're looking at about $10 million of spend this year.

Michael Urban -- Seaport Global Securities -- Analyst

Okay, got you. That is all for me. Thank you.

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Mike.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from the line of Tom Curran from FBR. You're now live.

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Thanks for letting me back in guys. Sticking with the same recent line of questioning on the strategic initiative to expand Waters' TAM, Chris, could you expand on the specific offerings you're considering within two areas of desal plant construction, one would be installation and fabrication, and then the other equipment and materials. I felt like we've talked a lot about the existing exposure you have in pumps, and how you might be looking to expand there. But those two areas, they're pretty broad and vague sounding. So maybe if you could just provide some more color on what specifically in each of them you might be interested in?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So we're -- great question, by the way, and where we're focused is on expanding from our Pressure Exchanger out in that area of the plant. In terms of the overall, that's the main desalination part of it, RO process. And so when we think about growth there, on the mega projects we're looking at getting a larger crack at pumps certainly, fracs and manifolds, and things of that nature in that area. And then we'll expand from there.

On the OEM side of the business, which is where we certainly have greater competition, we are looking to not only improve our overall technologies, but then expand our pump offerings there as well. I think historically we've shown a pie chart in our IR material that talks about our total addressable market and more specifically where we play, namely in the Pressure Exchanger or the Energy Recovery area and then to a lesser extent in pumps. So we're trying to get more exposure to the pump market in general, and then we'll expand from there.

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Okay. And then beyond the award hotbed, that is the Middle East, could you also expand upon the nature and the potential of the opportunities you're seeing in some of the other nascent RO desal growth markets like Chile, Australia and Asia, outside of China, such as Singapore. Where across those are the less high-profile growth markets? Have you started to see maybe signs of an acceleration or some interesting movement?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, certainly you mentioned Chile, we're certainly seeing activity there. I think there has been some discussion in the news as of late, that certain other areas down in Australia are starting to need desalination activity again. They were certainly -- they went to a water surplus for a while there. It seem like they built a whole bunch of plants and then it's immediately started to rain. Well, that issue has now come back to them in their focus there. But, right now it's mostly Middle East, Africa, regions like that. We're also seeing a move in a lot of regions to converting thermal plants to desalination or to SWRO facilities, and that's a big boon for us, because there's a lot of those plants out there.

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Great. Thanks for fielding my questions.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Joseph Osha from JMP Securities. You're now live.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Hey, I'm back. To continue the previous question there for a little bit. We -- so you may have just seen that this New Fortress Energy deal came and part of what was going on there is gas fired power in smaller Caribbean markets like Puerto Rico and Jamaica, and places like this. One of the issues that came up there is power for desal. So I'm wondering what kind of potential you see in some of these much smaller form factor desal equipment, in some cases, like the container form factor stuff or are you playing in that space and what do you think of it?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, we do play in the smaller plants, in the small containerized areas. So we sell into those with the actual companies that create those products.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Can you imagine an environment where you might want to trying for, obviously I think it's pretty clear you don't want to do membranes, but were -- given your reach could you become some kind of system integrator or you just happy selling -- selling parts into those companies?

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I mean, we definitely want to begin to develop solutions, but we're not offering more to our end customers, including these containerized type companies that are building those small RO systems. However, we don't -- we're not interested in competing with them to do that.

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay, all right. I got it. Okay. Thank you.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. Absolutely.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we have no further questions in queue at this time. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

All right. Thank you for joining us this afternoon and we appreciate your continued support of our Company. We look forward to providing an update on our next earnings call, and I guess at the eight weeks. So thank you very much and have a great rest of your day.

Operator

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude our teleconference for today. You may now disconnect your line at this time and log off your computer. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.

Duration: 41 minutes

Call participants:

James Siccardi -- Vice President of Investor Relations

Joshua Ballard -- Chief Financial Officer

Chris M. Gannon -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thomas Curran -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Joseph Osha -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Michael Urban -- Seaport Global Securities -- Analyst

More ERII analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Friday, March 8, 2019

ABM Industries (ABM) Q1 2019 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble with words 'Fool Transcripts' below it

Image source: The Motley Fool.

ABM Industries (NYSE:ABM) Q1 2019 Earnings Conference CallMarch 7, 2019 8:30 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the ABM Industries first-quarter 2019 earnings conference call. [Operator instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host today, Ms. Susie Kim, vice president of investor relations and treasurer.

Please proceed, ma'am.

Susie Choi -- Vice President of Investor Relations and Treasurer

Thank you all for joining us this morning. With us today are Scott Salmirs, our president and chief executive officer; and Anthony Scaglione, executive vice president and chief financial officer. We issued our press release yesterday afternoon announcing our first-quarter fiscal 2019 financial results. A copy of this release and an accompanying slide presentation can be found on our corporate website.

Before we begin, I would like to remind you that our call and presentation today contain predictions, estimates and other forward-looking statements. Our use of the words estimate, expect and similar expressions are intended to identify these statements. These statements represent our current judgment of what the future holds. While we believe them to be reasonable, these statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially.

These factors are described in the slides that accompanies our presentation as well as in our filings with the SEC. During the course of this call, certain non-GAAP financial information will be presented. A reconciliation of those numbers to GAAP financial measures is available at the end of the presentation and on the company's website under the Investor tab. I would now like to turn the call over to Scott.

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Susie. Good morning, and thanks for joining us for our first quarterly call of the new fiscal year. By now, I'm sure you've had a chance to review the corresponding press release we issued yesterday afternoon. I'm pleased that our first-quarter performance signals a good start to the year as the results met our expectations.

This was particularly encouraging given the tough comparison we were facing due to our organic outperformance last year. The execution of our entire organization has been tremendous as we've been driving our business during this challenging labor environment and also preparing for the rollouts of our many critical IT implementations that are occurring throughout the year. The amount of effort and focus needed is like nothing I've seen in my career while team continues to rise up. And outside of operations, there were a number of accounting changes that began this quarter as well, namely the adoption of ASC 606 and 853 as well as our new presentation of the intersegment revenue.

Anthony will discuss the implications of these in greater detail shortly, but we've been very busy, to say the least. To summarize, revenue grew to $1.6 billion for the quarter, an increase of 1.2%, or approximately 2% on a more normalized basis when adjusting for the aforementioned accounting changes. Our GAAP continuing earnings per share was $0.20 or $0.31 on an adjusted basis. And our adjusted EBITDA margin was 4.3% for the quarter, which also reflects some incremental positive impact from those accounting changes.

A few highlights from the quarter included sustained momentum within business and Industry, and technology and Manufacturing, as both of these segments expanded with strategic national accounts and drove bottom-line results. We've been focusing on maximizing our scale and building on these large multisite clients since organizing under our industry group structure. This is a great testament to how our service excellence and stellar relationships can lead to continuing opportunities as our clients grow. Our domestic Technical Solutions business was another bright spot during the quarter as we continued to build the strong pipeline of projects with the backlog of both the $100 million mark, which is churning at a healthy rate.

We are particularly excited about the early cross-selling activity in the education sector and in certain municipalities. You may have read our press releases announcing some great wins including our Energy Performance Contracting win at West Mifflin Area School District in Pennsylvania, and our Water meter replacement project for the Rainbow Municipal Water District in San Diego, California. We're also seeing gradual, steady progress at some of the business segments that have been challenged. Aviation has been pressured as a result of the tight labor markets and the elevated PSA hiring process, which can be more protracted.

And as we've discussed in this market, speed to hiring is a competitive advantage. To combat some of these pressures, our strategy of expanding into new service lines and higher pay scales to attract team members continues to gain traction. I'm excited to announce that we're going to start a new airplane fueling operation this month. While our initial assignment is not large compared to some of our other concentrated contracts, it is an example of how our industry group structure has led to new opportunities to provide value for our clients beyond our legacy service contract mix and give ABM the opportunity to diversify our Aviation offering.

As we progress through 2019, we will remain focused on the key themes we outlined on our year-end call: Growing our business through new sales while managing retention, continuing to navigate the difficult labor environment, optimizing our business through technology and data and generating consistent free cash flow. Our commitment to growth is unwavering as we continue targeting new sales accelerations, managing retention strategically and pushing hard for escalations, where appropriate. It's fairly for me to see how energized our teams are to drive sales across all our industry groups. I just returned from a quarterly business review with our industry group presidents, and one of our many discussions revolved around new cross-selling strategies and how we can maximize up selling, different services within each industry growth.

Our sales culture is undeniable, and I'm pleased to report that we met our first-quarter target for new sales. As you know, our goal is to replicate the record-breaking new sales performance we achieved in fiscal 2018. We continue to manage the difficult labor environment, which remains in a similar state for the last few quarters. We've increased the number of recruiters in the field and are being as creative as ever in attempting to attract employees but make no mistake, it's a challenge.

On a positive note, we've seen some success with our targeted operational action plans and pursuit of pricing escalations. While it's about getting through a cycle, leveraging our relationships and having active dialogues with our clients continues to be the key to recovering price over time. Client engagement will be particularly important as we navigate the uncertainty surrounding the economy. It remains to be seen whether the next 12 months will prove to be as resilient as the previous 12 months, or whether there will be a slowdown in economic activity or customer decision-making.

From tracking labor trends to client decision-making on projects, we are keenly focused on any potential change so we can calibrate our business nimbly. We have certainly proven we can operate in any environment because we have the unique ability to customize our approach by client, and the fact that our services remain core to the operations of the facility in good times or challenging ones. Leveraging our strength through technology and data continues to be one of the highest priorities with systems going live throughout the year. Since November, we have successfully launched our new HRIS system and implemented e-pay, our new cloud-based time and attendance system for our distributed workforce.

E-pay now allows our field teams to manage and schedule labor at the site level with real-time dynamic data. Over the next several quarters, we will learn and improve based on gaining a deeper understanding of practical application these tools can have on our operations. Our goal is to achieve productivity improvements. And in the next year, we expect to enhance functionalities via updates and module additions for maximum effectiveness.

We are also actively working on the implementation of our new Oracle fusion ERP system, which is slated to go live in the second half of this year and provide a strong financial data framework as we look to fiscal 2020 and beyond. Since the inception of our 2020 vision, we have been speaking about becoming a data-driven company. These enhancements are providing a stronger foundation for our operators, and over the next couple of years, we are looking forward to gaining a higher degree of insights that will lead to better plans, more informed decisions and greater operational efficiencies. From a free cash flow standpoint, our outlook remains unchanged.

The first quarter has historically been our lowest cash flow period. But on a trailing 12-months basis, free cash flow is approximately $200 million. In closing, I want to thank our entire organization for a solid start to the new fiscal year. These are exciting but particularly busy times at ABM and our team members continue to execute.

We remain focused on increasing ABM's scalability, efficiency and nimbleness, so we can raise the bar for excellence even higher. And we would not have progressed to this point without the support and guidance of our board of directors. We have several members retiring this year, and I want to thank them for their contribution and service to ABM over the years. Phil Ferguson, Tony Fernandes, and Lauralee Martin have not only been valuable partners and advisors to our company, but they have been role models to me personally, and I know I speak for Anthony as well.

ABM has been building trusted relationships with our clients and team members for over the past 110 years. And today, we are one of the largest facility services company in the world. The improvements we are making this year in conjunction with an already diversified and resilient business model will optimize and strengthen our future legacy. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Anthony.

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, and good morning. I'd also like to commend our team for executing during the first quarter, while simultaneously working toward launching our many transformational IT projects. With any major system and process implementation, change management is a key component. And as we deploy our system, we are also carefully assessing and identifying the necessary updates and modifications we must make to fully take advantage of the technology we are putting in the hands of our employees.

With the projects that have gone live thus far namely HCM and e-pay, we are encouraged by what these systems have to offer in terms of productivity and consistency in data capture and analytics. But we realize these benefits will take time to fully mature across our employee base. As Scott mentioned, our next major project is our cloud-based ERP system rollout, which we anticipate will begin in the second half of this year and begin to streamline our back-office function, create a more efficient control framework and provide a scalable platform for our future. As you can imagine, there is much work involved but we are very excited about the potential of a more integrated financial system and end-to-end process.

Regarding our retiring board members, I'd like to thank them as well. In particular, as the chairman of our Audit Committee, Tony Fernandes has provided a great deal of guidance since my appointment as CFO, and I've valued his perspective and advice over the years. Now before I dive into our results, let me provide you with a few notes. Our first-quarter results reflect GCA's complete embedding into our organic base.

As Scott mentioned, our results now reflect our adoption of accounting standard topic 606 and 853. These changes are as follows: Impact of revenues associated with service concession arrangements was approximately $11 million, reflected predominantly in our Aviation segment. Sales commission costs are now deferred and recognized over the expected customer relationship period, ranging from one to eight years. Previously commission costs were expensed incurred.

While impacting all segments, this primarily impacted technical solutions due to how commission plans are structured in that segment. The total amount deferred that was previously expensed was approximately $1 million. The profit on uninstalled materials associated with our technical solutions, project-related contracts are now deferred until installation is substantially complete. Previously, these amounts were recognized upon delivery under the percentage of completion method, the impact was approximately $1 million.

Initial fees from sales of franchise licensees are now deferred and recognized over the terms of the initial franchise agreements ranging from one to three years. Previously, initial fees from sales of franchise licenses were recognized when sold. Franchise fees are reflected in our technical solutions segment, but we did not have a material impact from the adoption of 606. In total, our revenue for the first quarter on a year-over-year basis was reduced by $11.3 million, associated with service concession arrangements or ASC 853.

ASC 606 had a $1.3 million impact to revenue and a $0.03 impact to income from continuing operations per diluted share on an non-adjusted and adjusted basis. Now let me address our first-quarter results, as reported. Total revenues for the quarter were $1.6 billion, up 1.2% in total and approximately 2% organically versus last year, which was driven by the business and industry, technology and manufacturing and technical solutions segments. On a GAAP basis, our income from continuing operations was $13 million or $0.20 per diluted share compared to $28 million or $0.42 last year.

Last year's results reflect a onetime net tax benefit of $21.7 million due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities, which was partially offset by a tax expense associated with the repatriation of foreign earnings. On an adjusted basis, income from continuing operations for the quarter increased to $20.8 million or $0.31 per diluted share compared to last year. ASC 606 positively impacted these results by $0.03 on both a GAAP and adjusted basis. During the quarter, we generated adjusted EBITDA of approximately $68.8 million at a margin rate of 4.3% compared to $65.1 million at a margin of 4.1% last year.

These results were partially driven by the full run rate of synergies related to our GCA acquisition as well as the B&I segment contribution. Higher labor and related also impacted our year-over-year results as we did not begin experiencing labor pressures until the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal 2018. Having said that, the net of these factors were planned for in our quarterly and full-year guidance. Turning to our segment results.

As we mentioned last year, beginning in 2019, we will be breaking out total intersegment revenue, which reflects services provided between our industry groups. Our B&I segment grew $775 million or 2.4%. Since the last year, B&I has demonstrated strength underscoring the resilience of our business as it continues to drive performance. Expansion of strategic national accounts and tag growth in urban markets contributed to this quarter's performance.

Incremental revenue from our U.K. operation also contributed to the quarter, but we do not expect that trend to continue as our largest contract with the Transport for London comps fully during Q2. Operating margins for the quarter were 4.7% versus 3.8% last year, driven by higher margin revenue contribution and certain onetime items that benefited the quarter by approximately 30 basis points, including lower SUI and SUTA taxes in certain states. Aviation reported revenues of $252 million reflecting $11 million reduction related to ASC 853 due to the accounting for public sector parking leases.

These amounts are not classified as contra-revenue, where it was previously reported as rent expense. This segment also experienced the loss of certain airline contracts last year, predominantly beginning in Q3. Operating profit for the quarter was approximately $4 million. We continue to make strategic investments in our team and are encouraged by our new contract wins in catering and logistics, and as Scott announced, airplane fueling operations.

Looking ahead, we remain balanced in our outlook between new contract wins and anticipated losses in certain markets and service lines as contracts come up for renewal, while certain services are in sourced. Technology & Manufacturing revenues increased approximately 2% to $236 million with an operating profit of $18 million. T&M has been another strong performing segment since last year, as this business continues to expand with our top High Tech clients while also driving good tag revenue. Revenue in education was $205 million, a year-over-year decline of approximately $2 million reflecting last year's tough renewal season, as this segment was navigating a greater degree of pressure related to labor and pricing.

In our continued effort to navigate the labor market, we were more measured in our approach to renewals, as we sought to maintain and improve our contract mix. Q1 of last year was a period of transition and integration. So on a comparable basis, the team's discipline and focus on stabilizing labor cost in remaining markets as well as the impact of synergies led to operating profit and margins above last year. Looking ahead, our education team is focused on capitalizing on opportunities for the critical April to May buying season, and our K-12 markets and continues to build our pipeline in the end markets we serve.

Cross-selling and targeting first-time outsourcing opportunities also remain a key long-term focus. healthcare revenue was $67 million for the quarter with operating profit of $1.2 million. We continue to see long-term opportunities in this segment, although it's currently not performing to the expectations, and we continue to look at structural changes to address these challenges. Finally, technical solutions reported revenues of $108 million, up 4% versus last year.

Our U.S.-based business continues to thrive as growth occurred at a high single-digit rate, driven by a combination of increases in electrical vehicle charging stations installation, bundled energy projects and maintenance work. We're also seeing opportunities in our electrical power services as data center expansions are increasing and our 35 years of needed certification continues to be a competitive advantage. Offsetting some of these results was an expected contraction in our U.K. business, stemming from conditions we discussed heavily last quarter.

For the overall segment, operating profit for the quarter was approximately $6 million at a margin rate of 5.5% versus 5.3% last year. Positively impacting the quarter was the impact of ASC 606. As I mentioned earlier, 606 had a heavier impact on this segment as sales commissions are no longer expensed incurred and the profit associated with uninstalled materials is no longer recognized upon delivery. These two factors had approximately a positive $2.5 million impact to operating profit in the quarter.

Overtime, we expect these amounts to normalize but quarter-end delivery of equipment and expected revenue could add some volatility. Lastly, we are encouraged by Technical Solutions sales pipeline, the largest we've seen in many quarters and project backlog. And outside the potential timing impact related to 606, we expect the operations to be in line with our historical growth and profit ranges. Turning to cash and liquidity.

Cash flow from operating activities in the first quarter of the fiscal year are usually lower than in subsequent quarters, primarily due to the timing of certain working capital requirements. Our DSOs and working capital were modestly behind our internal forecast but our teams remain focused, and we are confident in maintaining our strong trailing performance. We ended the quarter with total debt including standby letters of credit of $1.2 billion and a bank-adjusted leverage ratio of approximately 3.45 times. During the quarter, we paid our 211th consecutive quarterly cash dividend of $0.18 per common share for a total distribution of approximately $12 million to stockholders.

Finally, while we are adjusting the first quarter, and we are not updating our financial outlook for fiscal 2019, I wanted to remind everyone that we previously mentioned that the new accounting pronouncements could have a negative $0.05 to a positive $0.05 impact on our results for the total year, which we did not include in our guidance outlook range. We will continue to communicate the impact of the accounting change with each successive quarter as we progress through the year. Operator, we are now ready for questions. 

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. [Operator instructions] Our first question comes from Andrew Wittmann with Robert W. Baird. Please proceed with the question.

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

Great. Good morning and thanks for taking my question. I guess, I wanted to start a little bit, I guess, with education. Thank you, Anthony, for the detail talking about kind of the explanation of the growth rate, it sounded like last year's retention was kind of which -- what's driving the growth rate to be negative.

But I guess on the longer-term basis, I still think that this is probably the -- and you've mentioned this in your script, and this is probably the best secular opportunity for first-time outsourcers though. Given that GCA is now in the base and an extra quarter as well, Scott, how should we evaluate your success in growing that business from here? What is the target? Or maybe what's the growth rate that you're happy with and not happy with? I think GCA's history has been pretty growthy company over time, and undoubtedly, when you bought it, you expected that to continue to be the case. So I want to understand how you -- what you would consider to be the successful growth rate coming out of Education?

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Thanks, Andy. I don't think anything has changed. We've continued to say we think this will be a GDP-plus business, and we still feel strongly that it will.

And you have to remember, we're still early on, right? We're just putting our teams together. We -- from a cross-selling standpoint, we're just starting to get traction now. And I think a lot will be told as we head into the buying season. As you guys know, the buying season is really in that April, May, June, July period, and we feel good about our pipeline going into it.

So we're super positive about Education. And to your point, it is -- for us, we look at this as a $25 billion potential market, and a lot of it is still in-sourced. And we have projects going on internally to target outsourcing some of those in-sourced accounts but that's a longer-term initiative for us. So again, we feel really positive about this segment.

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

OK. That's helpful. I guess, I wanted to dig next into -- let's talk about aviation and the healthcare segments. I guess I'd like to understand both of these segments kind of started the year slow in terms of the margin performances versus where you expect them to end the year, based on your segment margin guidance, and even those margins are up pretty significantly, I think, year-over-year basis as well.

So I guess my question here is, what's going to change in Aviation and in healthcare in particular, to help you achieve the margin targets that you laid out?

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So Aviation, and we know this, right, from history, it's a cyclical business, and you have these-large scale contracts first. Right now the biggest -- I guess, the biggest impediment in Aviation is still the labor market, the things that I talked about in my script, right? It's just a longer hiring process, and we are typically on the lower scale in terms of wages for the services we do, which is why we're looking at things like catering, logistics and airplane fueling, which could -- and having higher pay rates. So for us, it's as much a labor story as anything else.

And top line, it's in and out there. There are cycles where the airlines will take certain of our services and move them in-house and we've seen that, and there are other times where they look to outsource. So when we look at Aviation, we tend to look at it in kind of two to three-year trenches because of the cycles of the airlines and how big they are. But we still feel really strong about that segment long term.

And then with healthcare, just to bring that aligned, that's -- it's a small segment. We had -- recently, we had a leadership change, someone that's come from our Technical Solutions business. We think there's opportunity as we look at our mix of business to have more critical services there, which tends to be higher margin, and we're pushing along in that area of healthcare. We feel good about healthcare as well.

And Anthony, I don't know if you wanted to add.

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes. The only thing I would add, Andy, is on Aviation, as you recall, last year, we had some start-up cost that from a margin perspective impacted us in the second half, and we were clear around that impact. So as you look at the margin progression throughout the year, assuming from a comparability standpoint, that doesn't lapse. We should have some expansion on the margin side just from the comparability issue.

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

OK. That's helpful. And then just a point of clarification here. There was a lot of, I think, important numbers on the accounting that came out pretty fast.

We'll check the transcript on some of them, but maybe the most important one was, I think, around this 30 basis points, Anthony. This -- I think, you said, had to do with state unemployment insurance and something else that I wasn't familiar with. I guess my question is, can you explain that a little bit more? Was that 30 basis points benefit to the consolidated results? Or was that when you're talking about B&I? I'm sorry what's that I missed but I think is important.

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes. Don't worry, there's a lot of changes in the quarter, so I understand the confusion. This is not an accounting change. This is a state unemployment change that occurred at the beginning of the year that predominantly benefited B and I just because of their presence in certain jurisdictions that had those changes and it's predominantly in the payroll tax area.

So when you look at B&I's results, their results were favorably impacted by the FUTA, which is a federal unemployment tax, and SUI taxes, which as you know, are more first-half loaded than second-half loaded, but did have an impact on all segments but B&I predominantly.

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

OK. So that's 30 basis points to the company then?

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

30 basis points to the company, but to B&I. So 30 basis points to B&I would be less on a consolidated basis.

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

OK, OK. And so did the unemployment insurance tax rates decrease, and you're still able to bill at the same level? Is that what happened or what was typically -- is that's what happened?

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

That's exactly right.

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

OK, cool. Let's see here, what else. So just last question for now. Maybe I'll jump back in.

But on software and IT, and clearly a lot of important initiatives that are -- that you're working all very hard on. And I think what you're doing there was clear and the timing on those programs and what they're supposed to do for you was also clear. But I guess Anthony, as you embarked on this cloud-based ERP or even as you still put out in the initial stages here of the other timekeeping thing, are you carrying extra costs today for change management consultants, just extra IT staff or other things? Can you get your arms around the magnitude of those? And when those might peel off? And then I think also important is your thoughts on when the efficiency benefits can be -- can start to be realized and to what degree?

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes. There are some costs that are being capitalized as part of the implementations that go through our capex budget, and we outline that at year-end in terms of the increase in capex associated with the investments. There are some duplicative costs that we're capturing as part of the integration as we migrate over, and as we migrate away from legacy systems there's some duplicative costs that we're capturing as part of our transition. To your question around where the benefits, it's really -- it is going to be 2020 and beyond, Andy.

These systems when they go live, it takes time from change management, exactly your point for us to start to realize the benefits. Some of them will be immediate from the back of the house perspective in terms of efficiencies. But when you look at the front line, which is where the price really is in terms of operating on a more efficient basis, that takes time. And I think that's going to be a multiyear journey.

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

And the way I think about this, Andy, is that when you do these systems implementations, especially these more broad ones, I look at this in three phases, right? The first phase is changing behavior of our people to get them to use it and play around with it, right? And you get through that phase. And then it's the second phase, which is like you start getting learnings from it, and you start like understanding the data what it can mean and then really Phase 3 of this is how do you apply those learnings and actually get a move on operational efficiency where it hits bottom line. And there's no -- I don't think there's any set time line for each of these phases. So I think with some of them, we're just in that initial phase of how do you change behavior like I look at the tag price, right, that we've put in over a year ago and our first phase of this was like getting adoption, getting usage, and we're pretty much where we want to be.

Now we're in this phase where what are we learning from it? And ultimately, we'll get to a point where it will actually have some significant impact. So it's just -- it's a timing thing.

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

I might jump back in later, but I'll yield the floor for now.

Thanks. Our next question comes from Tate Sullivan with Maxim Group. Please proceed with your question.

Tate Sullivan -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Hi. Thank you. Good morning. Thank you for that detail on Technical Solutions on what helped that segment grow faster than your other segments.

Just a couple of clarifications. When you said backlog is greater than $100 million in that segment, is that for all the business in Technical Solutions or just certain projects that you book as backlog?

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

That's all the business.

Tate Sullivan -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

And directionally, is that up from prior year or historically higher?

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes. We have the largest backlog at the end of Q1 that we've had in our history, where we ran out of $100 million that's where we feel it's a healthy backlog, and it's really a function of backlog and churn. And we try to target a relative proportion in terms of how that ultimate backlog gets recognized, and we feel really pleased about that group's execution on the piping as well as the execution from churning that backlog.

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. And I would just tell you -- just to give you some color commentary on this, I would just add, one of our largest gatherings, we had over 1,400 people in the Technical Solutions space between our in-house people and our franchise operations and that group just got -- has so much enthusiasm, so excited about everything that's going on in the energy space right now and the power space. We're really, really optimistic about the future of where this is all heading.

Tate Sullivan -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

OK. And then Anthony, I think you mentioned to the growth in Technical Solutions is in line with historical growth rates but what are -- I mean, are you referring post-GCA or how should I frame that comment?

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes. I think Technical Solutions really continue to be the tale of two cities or two regions, the U.S. and the U.K. From the U.S.

perspective, it continues to be a growth area. We see a positive pipeline. Our growth has been close to double-digit, and as we mentioned, over $100 million of backlog. U.K.

continues to operate in the challenge macroeconomic environment, as expected, so even though it's down, it's -- what we expected, given some of the challenges that we outlined late last year on the macroeconomic front. So when we look at the Technical Solutions business in totality performing as expected. But in the regional perspective, the U.S. is clearly outperforming.

Tate Sullivan -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

OK. Is the U.K. -- can you quantify or prefer not to as the U.K. majority of that Technical Solutions workers?

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

No, the U.K.'s roughly $20 million I think in the quarter for the total amount of revenue that we generate.

Tate Sullivan -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

OK. And then last one for me. You mentioned getting them to fueling in your aviation business in addition of the catering service that you did before. Is your -- do you experience meaningful upfront costs when expand services in one of your business segments?

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Sometimes we had some upfront, what we call, start-up costs. For this particular, there was not material start-up cost that we would outline or call out given the small nature of the contract in totality.

Tate Sullivan -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

OK, OK. Thank you very much for all that detail. I'll jump back in line.

Operator

Thanks. [Operator instructions] Our next question comes from Marc Riddick with Sidoti. Please proceed with your question.

Marc Riddick -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Hey, good morning. I wanted to touch on the Education area for a moment and maybe if you could talk a little bit more about what you're looking at going into the key selling season? If there's a way to sort of -- for folks to think about the changes in the go-to-market strategy or maybe some of the things that you think will be helpful in driving the Education sales that you see coming up in the seasonal time that would be very helpful.

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. I don't know that there's anything different than what our strategy was last year, right? We have -- we're expanding our sales force. We are being very strategic about how we're hitting it, and when we went into the sales season last year, it was really -- it was a point where GCA was just coming together, just getting integrated. And we would all say, we probably weren't as aligned and ready for the season as we are now.

I can tell you that our pipeline is up 20% year-over-year heading into the sales season, the big churn season for us versus where it was last year. So we're optimistic about that. So I think for the fact that we have some more time with GCA integrated under our belt, we're more prepared, we have more sales people, we feel good about it. So it's less of the different strategic approaches, it's more about getting one of our tactical ducks in line.

Marc Riddick -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

OK, great. And then circling back on Aviation for a moment, looking at the opportunities that you're pursuing in the catering and now with fueling, I was wondering if you could sort of touch a little bit about the potential scalability that you see with those? And also, and I don't know how connected this is but how that may or may not tie into the technology upgrades that you've got going on this year? What type of opportunities you think might be available not just maybe with those service offerings but then other future service offerings within the Aviation group?

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So I think it's early on for us on some of these new service lines. It's hard to kind of size the price when you're so early in. I could tell you on the catering and logistics side, we are seeing much more opportunity in terms of RFP than we would have imagined last year.

So it remains to be seen what our win rate will be clearly but definitely, a bigger pipeline of RFP, so that's pretty exciting. Fueling, way too early to tell, we've just got our first contract. And then from a technology side, it's less about technology. I think it's more about some of the older initiatives like beacon technology and being able to be more efficient in terms of dynamically dispatching our people.

And even that's still kind of early on, but we are focusing on that and with our new e-pay system, time and attendance, our hope is that, that's going to have some significant traction in the next 12 to 18 months in terms of scheduling. There's -- these scheduling dynamics in Aviation is very different than any of our other segments because if we think about it, being in an airport, it's a very horizontal kind of campuswide spread distributed versus more of a tighter vertical office building, if you will. So scheduling tends to be more important in the Aviation sector and more dynamic because you have heavy peak summer season and holiday season. So we're hoping over time that will have traction for us.

Marc Riddick -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

OK. And then last one for me. I was wondering if there are any -- and it may be a little early for this but when you're looking at some of the service line pushes that you're utilizing within Aviation, is it possible that we might see similar types of things when there was some commentary around potential structural changes within healthcare. So I was wondering if that's kind of -- if we could sort of see a similar blueprint within the healthcare segment going forward? Thanks.

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I think for healthcare, it will be a little different. healthcare will be more about focus. So in healthcare, we do a wide range of services.

This is one we are literally, if you think about in the acute situation, which in the hospital setting, we are valeting cars, we're parking cars, we're doing wheelchair pushes, we're cleaning, and we are taking care of some of the small critical equipment now whether it's an intravenous machine or what have you. And we even do some catering there. We have nutrition program. So I think for us, it's not about getting into a new service line, it's about where we want to focus and the critical equipment taking care of the small electrical and mechanical equipment, we think, has great opportunity for us, because it has margin potential.

And again, we're having a new leader that has experience in that area of focus, so could drive some real change. So it's less about new service line and more doubling down on one's that we're already playing at.

Marc Riddick -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

That's very helpful. Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. At this time I would like to turn the call back over to management for closing comments.

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, thanks, everyone, for joining. We're -- as you could tell, we're off to a really good start for the first quarter. For us, we look at this as how our sales are doing and our sales are on track and keeping with our historic record of last year, we're very focused on retention in this pricing environment, and we're going to continue to manage labor with acute focus and we'll be implementing our system. So we have a really busy year ahead of us in a dynamic environment, but as enthusiastic as ever about where we're heading, and I just want to, one last time, commend the team for everything they're doing, and thanks to everyone who are listening in.

And we'll see you in Q2. Thank you.

Operator

[Operator signoff]

Duration: 44 minutes

Call Participants:

Susie Choi -- Vice President of Investor Relations and Treasurer

Scott Salmirs -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Anthony Scaglione -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Andrew Wittmann -- Baird -- Analyst

Tate Sullivan -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Marc Riddick -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

More ABM analysis

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

10 stocks we like better than ABM IndustriesWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and ABM Industries wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 1, 2019